Symbolism In The Pearl Essays -- Steinbeck Pearl Essays

Symbolism in The Pearl by John SteinbeckNovels were created to aim a very naive view in great depth. The Pearl is a novel in its most complete form. Steinbeck does this by conveying liveliness symbolically. Through symbols, John offers the reader a clearer look at life and it?s content. He shows major imagery in four ways gum kino, music, Coyotito, and the Pearl of the World.Kino overall symbolizes clearly good and innocent. Kino is thought of as a wise, primitive man who is hungry for fortune because of the great pearl, which he discovers and later in the story he becomes an angry, frightened, but resolute man, determined to keep what he has earned. He is a young diver who lives in a small village on the coastline of Mexico. In the beginning of the story he has come to o...

Adolphus Huxleys Hyperion to a Satyr :: Adolphus Huxley Hyperion Satyr Essays

Adolphus Huxleys Hyperion to a Satyr Throughout the ages, there have been many ways to identify a persons sociable standing. Possessions such as homes, cars, and others, help to establish a persons place insociety. There are other ways also. Education, and a persons speech patternsare other ways to do this. But in Hyperion to a Satyr, Adolphus Huxleypresents his view that hygiene also played an integral part. Clearly, thisdoesnt hold as avowedly in these times, but perhaps in an earlier era thiswas an accurate measurement of wealth. But what role did hygiene play tosegregate peoplethroughout history? This interrogative get out be analyzed byapplying the meaningof metaphors used by Huxley. This article contains Huxleys views on many controversial subjects and their relationship todirt. But the most prominent comparison was between the fond classesand the level of hygiene associated with each one. Mr. Huxley goes on toillustrate this difference with a variety of metaphors. He talks abouthow this view changed throughout history, and how great people tried toinfluence social changewith implementation of their plans for widespreadequality in cleanliness. This paper willbegin analyzing the relationship between social classdistinctio n and hygiene using the metaphoric analysis method. Thiswill be done by premiere analyzing Huxleys piece as a whole, by analyzingboth text and metaphors. Hopefully this will reveal his true meaning ofthe piece. Next will be the identification of non-homogeneous metaphors that pertainto the research question. Then the metaphors will be broken down into thetenors and vehicles. After that, they will be analyzed and sorted by meaning.By doing this, hopefully the research question will be better explained,and the relationship between cleanliness and upper class will be clarified. Huxleys Hyperion to a Satyr is a piece that discusses the class separation system and how the concept of cleanliness and uncleanliness has helped to increase thegap between the different social classes. Huxley feels that, because therichwere able to afford the luxuries of living clean lives and the poorcouldnot, that this helped to further separate the classes. He uses manymetaphorsto prove this menstruation and expound on the relationship between socialclassesand hygiene. Now, to understand Huxleys view on the research question, we need to isolate the different metaphors used bathing was a badgeof class distinction, the gulf between rulers and ruled, from the peakof their superior... cleanliness, they were creatures of an entirely differentspecies, it was only the blessed pigs, and a tithe of their populationto untouchability.

Studies in Emotional Intelligence Essay -- Psychology Research Papers

Studies in Emotional Intelligence There is a growing interest in the concept of emotional intelligence, and with that growth is a gap between what we know and what we need to know. In the article, Emotional Intelligence Issues and Common Misunderstandings, Robert J. Emmerling and Daniel Goleman inquire as to what emotional intelligence is, how it differs from other established constructs at heart psychology, whether or not it can be developed, whether or not it can be a better prognosticator of work performance than traditional measures of intelligence, whether or not it should be measured at all, and how it relates to ethics. Emotional intelligence has a potential utility in predicting a range of criterion across assorted populations, but its predictive validity depends on the context, criterion of interest, and specific theory used. Traditional intelligence measures have been unable to account for a significant dowery of variance in career success and work performance. IQ was o riginally thought to account for twenty-five percent of how well people perform in their careers, while it was later discovered that IQ actually accounted for between four and ten percent. A more recent study found that IQ is a better predictor of work and academic performance than EI, but when it comes to becoming an extraordinary performer, IQ may be a less powerful predictor than EI. The failure of IQ to account for the variance between performance and success is especially evident among managers and senior leaders. IQ alone is unable to predict this as well as competencies that integrate emotional, social and cognitive abilities. Emotions and cognition are interwoven in the aspects of emotional intelligence, especially in interpersonal functioning, empathy, motivation, affective self-regulation, self-awareness, and Gordian decision-making. The range restriction on the variable of IQ among managers and senior executives may be the cause of IQs inability to predict the variance i n performance among managers. Leaders must process a great deal of complex information on a daily basis, and that requires a high take aim of cognitive ability. IQ simply provides a basis on which to recognize a minimal capability that all who are within a sealed job pool should have to keep their job. IQ should remain a predictor of the vocations that are available to an individual of a certain in... ...iduals may barely receive feedback related to technical competence, people skills, or leadership style. For an individual to improve on any ability, he or she would need realistic feedback concerning their service line abilities and progress. Providing valid and reliable feedback on specific emotional and social competence helps to provide individuals with insight into their strengths and areas for development. Providing a more balanced view and a validating environment can help to overcome feelings of defensiveness that often undermine the development of emotional and social c ompetencies. Emmerling and Goleman inquire as to whether or not EI is morally inert of or if it interacts with an ethical dimension. In psychology, morality and ethics are treated individually in a dimensin beyond the issues at hand. Certain aspects of EI certainly lam to promote prosocial behavior. Self awareness must be deployed to act in accord with ones own sense of meaning, purpose, and ethics. Empathy appears to be an essential footstep in fostering compassion and altruism. These two individuals stress that the progress of emotional intelligence is impressive, but there is still a lot to be discovered.

Do not go gentle into that Good Night and for Eleanor Boylan talking with God :: comparison compare contrast essays

Pain and Sorrow in Thomas Do not go gentle into that in force(p) wickedness and Sextons for Eleanor Boylan talking with God The end our road that is life, is death and the second we begin to live, we begin to die. A rendition of death and the damage of a loved one is expressed in two different lights in Dylan Thomas Do not go gentle into that Good Night and Anne Sextons for Eleanor Boylan talking with God. Both express the fear and vulnerability of losing someone you thought should live forever Thomas message is an crying one a dark and tangible energy whereas Sextons tone is more passive and quiet and more driven by ruthfulness than anger. But as there is an underlying sense of sorrow in Thomas villanelle, there is also a sense of quiet anger. In For Eleanor Boylan lecture With God, Sexton expresses the pain of losing a loved one. There is a surreal quality to the poem, Sexton seems to write as she thinks with a thought inciting a memory she communicates her feelings in a very literal concrete way but the poem is still very abstract because there is so runty linking these images, adding on to the feeling that you are looking into Sextons very mind and heart. She talks about Eleanor, a friend who is more beautiful than her draw this intimate compliment can be interpreted as more dear than even her mother. An aspect of Eleanor that Sexton respects is her closeness with God, there is a child-like trust depicted when the author writes about Eleanor in the kitchen motioning to God. Possibly because Eleanor is wearing a lemon-colored sundress, the reader imagines her with a smile and she feels the acceptance at her ingest death that Sexton cannot find. Eleanor has more faith than the author in God and who has maintained this faith even when she is dying. Sexton wrote that God had a face when she was sextuplet and a half meaning he was a tangible figure. The six-year-old Sexton had a familiarity with God, she knew what he looked like he was her friend, as i s the feeling in roughly children about God. But this image of god has become a huge ship of the line that covers the sky. There is no comfort in a slimy jellyfish and Sexton does not find any comfort in God.

jeremiah healy :: essays research papers

Jeremiah Healy is the award-winning author of the John Francis Cuddy private- detective series and the Mairead OClare legal-thriller series, both set primarily in Boston. Born in Teaneck, New Jersey on whitethorn 15, 1948, he graduated from Rutgers University in l970, got his JD at Harvard Law School in l973, and passed the Massachusetts Bar in 1974. He was an associate with a Boston right firm, from l974 to 1978, gaining a lot of courtroom experience. (Michaels, 2003)The Army ROTC helped pay for his education, and Healy served as a military police officer, leaving the Army in 1976 as a captain. He married Bonnie M. Tisler on Feb. 4, l978, the same year he began teaching at the New England School of Law in Boston. His first novel, Blunt zip written during the summer of 1981, was rejected 28 times before it was published in 1984. The book is dedicated To Bonnie, who is Beth. Healy has served as President of the Private Eyes Writers of the States for two years, and is a past Awards Chair for the Shamus. In October 2000, he was elected President of the International Association of Crime Writers (IACW). Books of his have been translated into French, Japanese, Italian, Spanish, and German. He was toastmaster at the 1996 World Mystery Convention (Bouchercon) and will be International Guest of Honor at Bouchercon 2004 in Toronto. (Michaels, 2003)Healy has written seventeen novels and over sixty light stories. Fifteen of these works have won or been nominated for the Shamus Award. The Mairead OClare legal thrillers are UNCOMMON JUSTICE, JUROR NUMBER ELEVEN, and A STAIN UPON THE ROBE, which has been optioned for Hollywood by Flatiron Films (producer of PAY IT FORWARD, starring Helen Hunt and Kevin Spacey). Healys later Cuddy novels include RESCUE, INVASION OF PRIVACY, THE ONLY GOOD LAWYER, and SPIRAL. A stand-alone private-eye thriller, TURNABOUT, appeared in December, 2001, and the second collection of his Cuddy mulct stories, CUDDY PLUS ONE, was published in the summer of 2003. The first collection of Healys non-Cuddy stories, OFF-SEASON AND OTHER STORIES, appeared from Five Star in June, 2003. (Cincinnati Media, 2005)Healys most recognized character, private investigator John Francis Cuddy, is more moral than religious, a man who believes strongly in representing his clients, keeping his promises, and ferreting out the truth. He stays sexually faithful to the memory of his baseless wife waiting until he finds someone he thinks can replace Beth in his life.

jeremiah healy :: essays research papers

Jeremiah Healy is the award-winning author of the John Francis Cuddy clandestine-investigator series and the Mairead OClare legal-thriller series, both set primarily in capital of Massachusetts. Born in Teaneck, New Jersey on May 15, 1948, he graduated from Rutgers University in l970, got his JD at Harvard Law School in l973, and passed the Massachusetts Bar in 1974. He was an associate with a Boston law firm, from l974 to 1978, gaining a lot of courtroom experience. (Michaels, 2003)The Army ROTC helped pay for his education, and Healy served as a military police officer, leaving the Army in 1976 as a captain. He married Bonnie M. Tisler on Feb. 4, l978, the same year he began teaching at the New England School of Law in Boston. His first novel, candid Darts written during the summer of 1981, was rejected 28 times before it was published in 1984. The book is dedicated To Bonnie, who is Beth. Healy has served as President of the Private eye Writers of America for two years, and is a past Awards Chair for the Shamus. In October 2000, he was elected President of the International Association of Crime Writers (IACW). Books of his have been translated into French, Japanese, Italian, Spanish, and German. He was toastmaster at the 1996 World Mystery Convention (Bouchercon) and will be International Guest of Honor at Bouchercon 2004 in Toronto. (Michaels, 2003)Healy has written seventeen novels and over lx short stories. Fifteen of these works have won or been nominated for the Shamus Award. The Mairead OClare legal thrillers are UNCOMMON JUSTICE, JUROR NUMBER ELEVEN, and A crud UPON THE ROBE, which has been optioned for Hollywood by Flatiron Films (producer of PAY IT FORWARD, starring Helen Hunt and Kevin Spacey). Healys later Cuddy novels include RESCUE, INVASION OF PRIVACY, THE ONLY GOOD LAWYER, and SPIRAL. A stand-alone private-eye thriller, TURNABOUT, appeared in December, 2001, and the second allurement of his Cuddy short stories, CUDDY PLUS ONE, was publi shed in the summer of 2003. The first collection of Healys non-Cuddy stories, OFF-SEASON AND OTHER STORIES, appeared from Five Star in June, 2003. (Cincinnati Media, 2005)Healys most recognized character, private investigator John Francis Cuddy, is more moral than religious, a man who believes strongly in representing his clients, keeping his promises, and ferreting out the truth. He stays sexually faithful to the retrospect of his dead wife waiting until he finds someone he thinks can replace Beth in his life.